Diplomacy
.
Web, the Internet transformed communication. By dint of being mesmerized by the traditional media, which, by comparison, are not so bad, we forget to look at where digital technology is evil, radical, finally: the organization and management policy, education, administration, among others. For example, diplomacy.
After the revelations of Wikileaks, the political changes underway in the Maghreb and the Middle East offer the sad spectacle, sometimes shameful, inefficiency and the vagaries of diplomatic activities. Bankruptcy readable these days in most media.
Should we still maintain political representations crossed hundreds of countries, including European countries? Should we keep the complicity and connivance necessarily implying with dictatorships, rotting or triumphant? This regal system, with its protocols archaic and its theater is expensive, cons-productive and compromising.
Internet, Web and telecom policy allowing direct communication, comprehensive, continuous, multimedia, agile and transparent. Document sharing, online collaboration, language assistance (interpretation and translation), archiving, rank: in business, those managing international activities know juggle these.
The influence of France in the world, is not that of its embassies: it is that these laboratories, its business, its products, its cultures and its armies.
What tools work for "external action State "at the time of the Internet and the Web? In an era of globalization, is it a political, economic, that is external, and at least Europe?
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment